I’ve been doing some research for a term paper on comparing democracies. Using Coppedge and Reinicke’s Polyarchy and Contestation data-set, I’ve identified those countries which would be perfect polyarchies were it not for their media systems, where government information is privileged. They are:

• Albania
• Botswana
• Cape Verde
• Croatia
• Dominican Republic
• Ecuador
• Guyana
• Honduras
• Israel and the occupied territories
• Kiribati
• Mauritius
• Mexico
• Namibia
• Panama
• Ukraine

These countries are doing something right. That’s to say, they score a one on fair elections, freedom of political organisation, and freedom of expression. But they’re falling behind in their media systems. As the coding schema for the Coppedge and Reinicke data-set puts it:

Alternative sources of information are widely available but government versions are presented in preferential fashion. This may be the result of partiality in and greater availability of government-controlled media; selective closure, punishment, harassment, or censorship of dissident reporters, publishers, or broadcasters; or mild self-censorship resulting from any of these.

(The countries in the data-set are scored using the US State Department’s Human Rights Report).