My article with Alan Renwick and David Hine is out now in Electoral Studies’ “in press” section. Abstract:
In December 2005, Italy’s mixed-member electoral system was replaced with a system of bonus-adjusted proportional representation. The reform conformed with rational-choice models in that it was imposed by the ruling coalition, which sought to bolster its own power interests. But the case illustrates the impossibility of reducing such power-based motivation to a single goal, such as seat maximization. Power is shaped by many factors, and electoral systems influence many of these. This article develops a theoretical framework for understanding the various power-oriented considerations that may operate in electoral reform. It then analyses the role these played in Italy. It argues, in particular, for the need to take account of coalition dynamics when studying such processes.
Chris Hanretty - How the 2001 result would have been with the current electoral law wrote:
[...] our article on Italian electoral reform was published, I was asked how the results of the Italian election of 2001 would have turned out if [...]
Link | June 21st, 2009 at 7:21 pm