<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chris Hanretty &#187; retequattro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/category/retequattro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Notes on Italian politics and public broadcasting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Saving ReteQuattro, kicking Rai into the long-grass</title>
		<link>http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/05/28/saving-retequattro-kicking-rai-into-the-long-grass/</link>
		<comments>http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/05/28/saving-retequattro-kicking-rai-into-the-long-grass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appointments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cappon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retequattro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/05/28/saving-retequattro-kicking-rai-into-the-long-grass/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After packing a previously uncontroversial bill full with measures that would help Retequattro avoid a move to satellite, the government yesterday lost a vote on one of the provisions contained there, on bird protection, of all things.
Gioacchino Alfano, justice minister, has now promised to listen to the opposition&#8217;s concerns about Retequattro. Quite what this means [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After packing a previously uncontroversial bill full with measures that would help Retequattro avoid a move to satellite, the government yesterday lost a vote on one of the provisions contained there, on bird protection, of all things.</p>
<p>Gioacchino Alfano, justice minister, has now promised to listen to the opposition&#8217;s concerns about Retequattro. Quite what this means is unclear.</p>
<p>Repubblica today also provides the latest scuttlebutt on the nominations race for Rai. Touted as potential centre-right nominees are Mauro Mazza (area AN), Marcello Veneziani (area AN),Giovanna Bianchi Clerici (LN), Alessio Gorla (close to Berlusconi). No news about centre-left nominees <em>apart from </em>the candidates for president of the board, which now, by tradition (and not, as Repubblica reports, by any provision of the law), falls to the opposition to nominate; and the opposition seems not to want Claudio Petruccioli to continue.</p>
<p>In the race for the post of director-general &#8211; which, as we all know, is nominated by the board, which acts entirely independently of any suggestions put to it (!) &#8211; Cappon seems to be out of the running, with <a href="http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefano_Parisi">Stefano Parisi</a> touted as a potential external candidate. It&#8217;s Cappon&#8217;s great misfortune to have come into Rai at difficult times for the organisation, in both cases shortly before general elections and the return of Berlusconi to power. I really wish that he would be given more time in the job &#8211; or indeed, that any director-general of Rai could last in the post for more than two to three years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/05/28/saving-retequattro-kicking-rai-into-the-long-grass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parliamentary manouevres in the dark</title>
		<link>http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/05/23/parliamentary-manouevres-in-the-dark/</link>
		<comments>http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/05/23/parliamentary-manouevres-in-the-dark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 11:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[berlusconi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retequattro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/05/23/parliamentary-manouevres-in-the-dark/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four months ago, the European Court of Justice ruled that one of Silvio Berlusconi&#8217;s stations, ReteQuattro, was broadcasting illegally on frequencies owned by another television company, Europa 7.
Berlusconi&#8217;s government is now trying to prevent that ruling from having effect. Not only that, but they&#8217;re doing it in a very under-hand way.
In April, just before the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four months ago, the European Court of Justice <a href="http://curia.europa.eu/it/actu/communiques/cp08/aff/cp080006it.pdf">ruled</a> that one of Silvio Berlusconi&#8217;s stations, ReteQuattro, was broadcasting illegally on frequencies owned by another television company, Europa 7.</p>
<p>Berlusconi&#8217;s government is now trying to prevent that ruling from having effect. Not only that, but they&#8217;re doing it in a very under-hand way.</p>
<p>In April, just before the elections, the Prodi government put together a bumper package of small changes to bring Italian law into line with recent rulings at the European level. <a href="http://www.camera.it/_dati/leg16/lavori/stampati/pdf/16PDL0000060.pdf">The law, consisting of fourteen articles</a>, was pretty uncontroversial: speaking for my part, I find it difficult to become excited about water regulation.</p>
<p>The Berlusconi government has now introduced an amendment to one of these articles &#8211; which previously, and somewhat improbably, concerned regulations of open-sea fishing  &#8211; which effectively negates the ECJ&#8217;s ruling. As far as I can understand from the <a href="http://www.camera.it/resoconti/resoconto_allegato.asp?idSeduta=8&amp;resoconto=allegato_a.000600&amp;param=sed0008.allegato_a.n6.sub0020#sed0008.allegato_a.n6.sub0020">amendment</a>, all frequencies already assigned are to remain assigned until the transition to digital.</p>
<p>To say that this shows blatant disrespect for European law is to put it mildly. In truth, I doubt it&#8217;s even a very good way of avoiding the judgement: the judgement still has to be put into Italian law by the <a href="http://www.giustizia-amministrativa.it/">Consiglio di Stato</a>, which originally referred the matter; but given the clarity of the ruling it&#8217;s difficult to see how the Consiglio di Stato can do anything but affirm the Court&#8217;s ruling in precedence to all other Italian legislation &#8211; including, if passed, this amendment.</p>
<p>Even worse, the issue of Retequattro is just a skirmish in a much wider battle concerning the legality of the Gasparri law governing telecommunications &#8211; which is already subject to <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/06/1019&amp;format=HTML&amp;aged=1&amp;language=EN&amp;guiLanguage=en">a letter of formal notice from the Commission.</a> More on the Europa 7 case [in Italian] at  <a href="http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europa_7">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/05/23/parliamentary-manouevres-in-the-dark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

