<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chris Hanretty &#187; voting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/category/voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Notes on Italian politics and public broadcasting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Abstentions in the Italian parliament</title>
		<link>http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/03/04/abstentions-in-the-italian-parliament/</link>
		<comments>http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/03/04/abstentions-in-the-italian-parliament/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[academic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/03/04/abstentions-in-the-italian-parliament/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently been investigating whethether high rates of abstentions and missing data cause problems for roll-call analysis of the Italian parliament. Here are some figures for the 14th Camera. Of the 1,141,673 possible votes (1657 rollcalls with 689 individuals):

23.5% were votes in favour
51.6% were votes against
1.8% were registered abstentions
23.1% were absent &#8212; that is, that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently been investigating whethether high rates of abstentions and missing data cause problems for roll-call analysis of the Italian parliament. Here are some figures for the 14th Camera. Of the 1,141,673 possible votes (1657 rollcalls with 689 individuals):</p>
<ul>
<li>23.5% were votes in favour</li>
<li>51.6% were votes against</li>
<li>1.8% were registered abstentions</li>
<li>23.1% were absent &#8212; that is, that particular legislator was not included in the roll-call</li>
</ul>
<p>which, according to <a href="http://polmeth.wustl.edu/retrieve.php?id=767">this paper by Rosas and Shomer</a>, is high compared to the US Congress and French Assemblee Nationale (4th Republic), but low compared to Brazil or Argentina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chrishanretty.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/03/04/abstentions-in-the-italian-parliament/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

